word war III

There are man good sources on the internet to get information from. You can go to the libraries website of your school for cerified sources, you can get online book, or you can go to a website most people use every so often liike myself, Wikipedia.
This is a website that was made to put up factual information on a subject and to keep it that way by having monitor on it making sure people keep the information free from opinions... not to argue over. The whole ordeal began with the wiki page of the Iranian Presidential candidate Ahmadinejad. I never knew that the mediation of a website would cause such drama and agrumentative cases on one's biography. The mediatiors would post back and forth changing as some would say what should be on the site. But getting onto the site to call Ahmadinejad a fascist is too much. It shouldn't be left to college students and bickering on the internet to decide what to believe about a presidential candidate. That power should belong to credited sites and doing such war on a website about a person is damaging to a career. He did speak some pretty controversial things when running, and yes controversy brings up arguing and not everyone agreeing, but seeing as to argue on Wikipedia for people to take information from shouldn't have happened and brought to that extent
I initially thought the article was going to tell me that Wikipedia is not a credible source, that it cannot be backed because it is just facts people put up; shared articles and what not. And now I know this fact to be true that even though one might think something is true they could be completely wrong in taking ideas from a site that ANYTHING on it can be monitored and changed. I guess this, in a way, opened a light on Wikipedia I need to look at more often than none, because this information seems less credible than ever as of now.